Big Bene wrote:German orthography is pretty straightforward, compared to English or French. But I would be interested how you pronounce my nick, please tell!
That's where I respectfully disagree. French and English, the two single most chaotic (in an orthographic sense) languages among European languages, shouldn't serve as comparisons. Czech or Italian, as you suggested, should. Those are straightforward.
Your own nickname is an example for how confusing German orthography is:
V1: Big Benne: open-mid, near-front, unrounded, short, as you suggest you want to be pronounced (as in
Big Ben)
V2: Big Beene or Big Behne: close-mid, front/near-front, unrounded, long -e- as in
dehnenVx: Big Bene: any pronunciation of the two. Intuitively and subconsciously I decided for V2. Why? It's more logical because for someone wanting to be pronouced V1 I would expect him to double the consonant as in (BeNjamin -> BeNNi/BeNNy. The -e- in Benjamin is already V1, so tell me about straightforward orthography). There you go.
Big Bene wrote:I respectfully disagree. Many Europeans do this to some degree, but it is really an issue only in Germany. And even here it is a relatively recent phenomen. It was not before the invention of radio that most people (here and elsewhere) even had the opportunity to know the original pronounciation of foreign words first-hand. For millenia, it was normal to have mostly written records of foreigen words. This mainly applies to place and person names, as of course for most other "everyday" words, the native term was used. Therefore, there is a German name ("Rom") and an English one ("Rome") for the Italian city of "Roma". München is Munich and Köln is Cologne in English. And even you would not pronounce "Paris" with a silent S. This is no shift in meaning, it's a variation of pronounciation in the context of different languages. And it even adds something to the "meaning" of those places that they have names in more than one language. It makes for diversity, and diversity is what makes the world rich and interesting.
Don't you think the cities you quoted as examples are and always have been OLD, RENOWNED, and very much "in aller Munde", even abroad? Those proper names were used so often that comfort started to play a role in pronouncing them. Ask any Englishman why their French loanwords are now pronounced so English that they just sound wrong.
Maitre d', which is, interestingly in itself a
farce loanword. Also, words and proper names as your town name examples were borrowed BEFORE there was common orthography.
The valid exmples would be those that haven't even been borrowed. Maybe I expressed this wrong. I wasn't talking about loanwords specifically, at least not eh long established ones. I was talking about sporadically used words and especially names from foreign languages.
What about
Avignon? Do you say /a'viknon/ after German orthography? I suppose not.
Sevilla. /sev'ija/, right? Here's the comfort/renown/frequently used example underlining my thesis from Spanish: Mallorca. Most Germans now say /malorka/ which sounds as wrong as it is in my ears. But they just say it so often they made its pronunciation comfortable.
The more often a borrowed word is used, the more likely it is to be changed according to the borrowing language's orthography.
My point being: I call a Juan /chu'an/, if only because I can. I even try to pronounce Chinese names right if I've heard the correct version, but that might just be me. And maybe it's not respect, but something different. Effort. Or just trying to get it right.