I just want to make sure you don't move on without me.
Make a small donation to Ye Olde Inn!
Every cent received goes toward Ye Olde Inn's maintenance and allows us to continue providing the best resources for HeroQuest and Fantasy Gaming fans.


Make a small donation to Ye Olde Inn!
Every cent received goes toward Ye Olde Inn's maintenance and allows us to continue providing the best resources for HeroQuest and Fantasy Gaming fans.
I've only seen Harry Potter 1 and it sucked monkey ass. I don't recall a basilisk in that one. It was crucial for my sanity that I would not see another one. It literally was a health issue, I'm not joking.TMU wrote:Haven't you seen Harry Potter? It's a giant snake that kills with its gaze and it's also venomous, so its venom kills as well
Maybe it is common after all. I asked a couple of friends and half of them knew what it was, although only one of them knew it for a reason other than having seen the sucky harry potter films.Goblin-King wrote:Basilisk is a mythological creature. It's a snake with 8 legs and a crest on it's head like that of a rooster. It's called the king of snakes. It has petrifying gaze. It's conceived by a hen nesting on a snake egg.
That's the basic gist.
Frankly I thought it was pretty common
But well, it doesn't really have to be. We could even create an original monster. People are able to comprehend something unfamiliar.






tasoe wrote:I've only seen Harry Potter 1 and it sucked monkey ass. I don't recall a basilisk in that one. It was crucial for my sanity that I would not see another one. It literally was a health issue, I'm not joking.TMU wrote:Haven't you seen Harry Potter? It's a giant snake that kills with its gaze and it's also venomous, so its venom kills as well
tasoe wrote:Maybe it is common after all. I asked a couple of friends and half of them knew what it was, although only one of them knew it for a reason other than having seen the sucky harry potter films.Goblin-King wrote:Basilisk is a mythological creature. It's a snake with 8 legs and a crest on it's head like that of a rooster. It's called the king of snakes. It has petrifying gaze. It's conceived by a hen nesting on a snake egg.
That's the basic gist.
Frankly I thought it was pretty common
But well, it doesn't really have to be. We could even create an original monster. People are able to comprehend something unfamiliar.


Teldurn wrote:I'm curious. We have a bunch of people posting as many different ideas about the types of monsters they would like to see. How are we supposed to decide which ones to use... just kind of ballpark figure which ones seem popular and go with that?
Sjeng wrote:Chaos Dwarves - common warriors, like orcs, melee
Chaos Beastmen - stronger warriors, like fimir, with several weapons (archers and melee types)
Chaos Minotaur - gargoyle like monster, melee
Chaos Warriors exist
Chaos Warlock exists (with some chaos spells of course)
Kobolds - like goblins, perhaps archers and spearmen
Lizardmen - the orc variants
Fimir - exist
Fimir Meargh - spellcaster with fimir spell deck, more BP and INT, perhaps a summon undead spell that raises bodies from the bogs.
Basilisk is a nice idea, I'll back it
I'm thinking that perhaps we should allow each quest to have a maximum of ONE unique monster, if it fits the theme, that's not necessarily aligned with either chaos or dragonkin. A mimic for example as an alternative trapped chest, or a Beholder as a boss, just in case someone has this great idea but can't use it because of the two restricting factions. But only ONE! and only if it fits the quest!











Return to HQ25th Brainstorming
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests