Nlinindoll wrote: But I think we can safely assume what those words mean.
As my old boss used to say, and he was a very wise man, 'Never assume anything'.
My point is I like to see how it is was intended to be played before I decide if I want to change something. But everyone will have different takes on the rules. You think the disguise rules are clear, Kurgan thinks they are partially ambiguous, and I think they are probably clear but may have one point overlooked, and we will all play it as we choose. Bareheaded warrior thinks the rules on opening chests are clear that you open the chest while I don't think that is the rule, but we both play it the same way in the end. One man's crystal is another man's murky.
I can read a rule and be totally satisfied on what it means but still change it.
I'm rambling now. So as Bareheaded warrior said, I am done with this now, although he did post afterwards...























