bastianbux wrote:My issue with the wording is the "have" rather than "did". "Have" means there's still the possibility in the future to do so. If they meant to say that should your Wizard not have used any actions, THEN he can go ahead and use one now out of turn-- during Zargon's turn--to cast the healing spell... then I would have expected them to word it something like: "If you are a spellcaster with a Healing Spell, and you did not perform an action on your turn, you can be healed by casting the spell on yourself." That not being the case, and the fact that they added in an "already" in there really makes it seem to me like either what Daedalus is asserting is the case (that this is only meant to save spellcasters from dying during traps) or that the wording is just funky and they mean to allow spellcasters to use the healing spell on themselves, which then uses up their next action.
Mostly: Potions of Healing can be used upon death to bring a Hero back to 4BP, so why would they restrict the spell to the Hero's PREVIOUS turn (which has already past) on the happenstance that said Hero did not--for whatever reason--use up an Action during that last turn. Really, it should affect the future turn any way you slice it.chaoticprime wrote:Play the game however you want. If you want the "spirit" of the rules to ignore the rules-as-written, that's your call.
That's obviously not the case. I prefer to adhere to the rules-as-written as much as possible. Which is why I'm hung up on "have" and "already" since both seem to confuse the matter.
From what you just wrote here, I can tell I won't be able to explain to you the point, nor why its not a bonus ability manifested through spontaneous precognition, anyway.
No need to be condescending.
Its does not say "have," it says "have not."
