Political correctness has it's place. When i see how some people are treated on work just because they belong to certain groups, and other people are strongly advantaged just because they come from a certain school then it is driving me nuts.
Cutting away chances from people who deserve them is one of the worst things you can do in the long run...
however there are certain activists who always take it one step further. They react without proof, on things that are not more as a rumor that could well be set into this world by an adversary of the rumor's target, and there are certain media who just copy and paste that to their front page. That's the other extreme.
Somewhere in the middle it is good, i am sure! You can't write a book playing 1700 something in the US without having slaves cleaning the rich man's house, indians being slaughtered and women staying at home to do the cooking, it is just not possible. And not everybody wants to press on the tear duct because of that, some maybe just want to write a western story.
I guess it is difficult to find the right balance. It's an author's task. I am more on the technical side.
I was just this year going thoroughly through the titanic data set on kaggle, to find factors that helped people survive on that boat. Well, it was connected to being a woman, sleeping on the right side of the boat or being rich. The richest first class passengers all survived. The medium and low first class men not so much, only their women survived. Second and third class was like a death sentence for most men, from the woman at least some survived. Also it helped not to be irish, whrereas i absolutely don't know why being irish was a factor.
That's what the factors were. Now how to talk about it? I don't know. You find a lot of correctness and gentleman behavior in the data. But you also find factors like being poor or being super-rich or being irish, which are the opposite of correctness and gentleman behavior. How to communicate that without looking too correct or too incorrect? I have no clue.
I was also going through some recent (this decade) USA census data checking for salary. You know what? With a recession analysis you can isolate and remove influence factors. So i removed education, place of living, skin color, age, years of experience on work, everything. Until only one factor remained: Being a man or a woman. In the original data, women earn in average 1.2$ less than men per hour. After removing all the noise factors, cleaned up from other influence, they earn 2$ less than men. The only reason why that doesn't shine through so heavily in the original census data is because usually women reach a much higher education than men, which helps covering up some of the difference.
That's political correctness as lived today. In the USA of today.
I can understand that some of the people at the wrong end on that scale get upset. But again, how to communicate that?
I be quiet now. We shall not talk politics here. Slap myself.