Pancho wrote:I very strongly doubt that Hasbro are giving a nod to the Bard. Personally I have seen ZERO evidence of engagement with the longtime Heroquest fans by this company, until it was time to sell their product, and even then I expect them to change almost nothing. It’s a straight up reprint (cough *cash grab*) just with new artwork and figures (which most HQ fans are dubious of, at best).
Given that nearly anyone looking for hero quest in any meaningful way has likely seen the Bardic Broadcasts extremely memeable and amusing video. Whether it actually is a recognition of the video, or merely an amusing coincidence we now have multiple Abominations to reference.
I disagree that it is a pure cash grab. (Though it could be argued that it is a money making opportunity, and as a business that is obligated to be responsible towards shareholders they probably like making money. Much like the rest of us who work jobs ... and grab cash at our respective employment.)
For those of us who didn’t get a copy back in the 80’s and 90’s and ended up on other games only to end up finding our way “back to HeroQuest” they are likely glad that they will have the opportunity to enjoy the game without paying the often brutal prices on the secondhand market. (I know that I’m pretty enthusiastic about it, others reactions may vary.)
My initial foray into “dungeon crawlers” was with a purchase of Warhammer Quest (1995), and I eventually circled around to other more recent implementations by GW (Silver tower, Shadows over Hammerhal, Blackstone Fortress) moving to “how can I play when I’m stuck social distancing” and leveraging tools like
Tabletop Simulator to play remotely with others and eventually finding some
Twitch.tv streamers playing heroquest.
Would I like to see a collaboration with GW and MB? Sure, that would be great! But GW tends to release a board game, provide about a year of support (give or take) and then they drop it for the next big thing as GW is not a board game company. They’re a miniatures company. And selling old miniatures tends to not have the financial benefits of releasing new stuff. (Also why they change rules and editions to sell new miniatures.)
Goblin-King wrote:Pancho wrote:By reaching out to fans I was thinking more along the lines of plumbing the community for info, rather than offering free stuff. I know and appreciate what you said earlier about no two HQ fans thinking alike on what they would like, but I believe we have ended up in a situation where hardly anybody (ahead of time, pre justification phase) would have asked for what we’re getting in terms of detail; regional availability, artistic style, Anime figures, round bases, all grey models, straight up reprint without ironing out the bugs etc.
Ah... like that
[ ... ]
As for round bases... Kill your freaking darlings!
As iconic the HQ bases are, they were always terrible. Heck, even the original prototypes used round bases.
The only way to add new miniatures into the game, was to either use different bases or murder a goblin.
This is one point where I think HQ20 is actually improving upon the original.
While I agree that the round bases are easier to add stuff into the game, I’m not sold that using the older square bases is bad. Especially with the potential options from Zealot miniatures and their square plastic bases. I’m actually considering stocking up on some of the Zealot Miniature bases to convert the hasbro version to square classic style. Or creating my own with thick plasticard. (Though that would mean base conversions... so there is that ... and they wouldn’t align with either the old plastic square GW bases, or the newer circular style. Decisions, decisions.)
FainFlynn wrote:Agree with Goblin-King on all fronts. Except for the use of Dread LOL. I have to believe Chaos isn't a copyrighted term. I'm curious as to why they changed that.
It allows MB/Hasbro a full split from the old GW line. “Chaos” in the Board game and in the storyline is explicitly wound into the GW product line. Chaos when used in reference to “Warriors of Chaos” etc. are trademarked by GW. (Though GW is moving to uniquely named from the more generic.) They are legally ensuring that they have a unique product and won’t have any blowback legally from GW, a company that used to be very legal action happy.
I’m somewhat conflicted on the naming, but from a word perspective it describes the type better than chaos. As chaos in a classical sense could well align with the elemental types, as opposed to the dread/necromantic style.