by Big Bene » May 17th, 2017, 11:33 am
What does "canon" mean in this context, anyway?
Originally, the term refers to the bible. There are texts the church recognizes as "holy", and other tradited texts that are considered "apocryphe" - they may be pious legends, downright "heretic" theology, or even factual history, but they are not "holy" and not part of the bible.
In the case of a franchise, the term is highly artificial. The owner may or may not choose to define a canon. Star Wars does so, and it causes problems more often than not.
What happened to the Expanded Universe when it was declared "non-canon"? Did these things never happen? Heck, we are talking a work of fiction here. Nothing of the Star Wars Story did ever happen. In Reality, these stories exist as just this: stories. Films, books and video games. Celluloid, paper and tiny electromagnetic chargings.
When a franchise owner defines a "canon" it is just to help his employees and productive fans to make pieces of fiction that in the end fit better together. But if anybody does make material that does "break" the canon, it has zero consequences.
But Milton Bradley around 1990?
I don't think they even remotely thought along theses lines. Published material was "official", and if a license was given, the result was just as "official" as anything. The aim was not a consistant parallel history, but a running, money-making franchise.
But the question of the person on the game screen, as I said above, has already been discussed in length.
No need to repeat every argument.
I just wanted to tell the Admiral about this discussion, and give the principal points of it, because he mentioned that "Morcar and Mentor look alike".
Plus, I just noticed that he really is Saruman and wanted to present my find, even if only as a joke.
Last edited by
Big Bene on May 17th, 2017, 12:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.